Difference between revisions of "Scope of Scientonomy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Normative | + | {{NonDefinitional Topic |
+ | |Topic Type=Normative | ||
|Question=What types of phenomena ''should'' a scientonomic theory explain? | |Question=What types of phenomena ''should'' a scientonomic theory explain? | ||
|Description=It is important for any science to have a clear idea as to what phenomena it ''ought'' to be explaining. This question is ''normative'', as its answers are necessarily ''prescriptions'' of what the scope of scientonomy ''ought'' to be. As such, this question is not to be confused with the descriptive question of the scope of this or that specific scientonomic theory. | |Description=It is important for any science to have a clear idea as to what phenomena it ''ought'' to be explaining. This question is ''normative'', as its answers are necessarily ''prescriptions'' of what the scope of scientonomy ''ought'' to be. As such, this question is not to be confused with the descriptive question of the scope of this or that specific scientonomic theory. |
Revision as of 02:51, 3 September 2016
References
- a b c d e f g Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ Vickers, John. (2014) The Problem of Induction. In Zalta (Ed.) (2016). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/.