Difference between revisions of "Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Sebastien-2017)"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|Accepted From Approximate=No | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
|Acceptance Indicators=The ontology became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0002|suggested modification]]. | |Acceptance Indicators=The ontology became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0002|suggested modification]]. | ||
| − | |Still Accepted= | + | |Still Accepted=No |
| + | |Accepted Until Era=CE | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year=2018 | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month=September | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day=26 | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators=The ontology became rejected when it was [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0002|replaced]] by [[Epistemic Elements - Theories Methods and Questions (Rawleigh-2018)]]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 01:31, 28 September 2018
that states ""
Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Sebastien-2017) was formulated by in .
Contents
Scientonomic History
In Barseghyan's original ontology of epistemic elements, only descriptive theories and employed methods were considered part of the process of scientific change. Normative theories were excluded from the ontology for their introduction appeared to be resulting in a destructive paradox. With the solution of the paradox by Sebastien, it became possible to introduce normative propositions as elements of the ontology of scientific change.
Acceptance Record
Question Answered
Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Sebastien-2017) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See for more details.
Description
This formulation introduces normative theories (e.g. those of ethics or methodology) into the ontology of scientific change. Thus, all the laws and theorems that concern theories apply not only to descriptive theories but also to normative theories.
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
