Difference between revisions of "Normative Effects of Scientonomy"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Topic
 
{{Topic
|Question=What is the normative extent of Scientonomy? What is the normative application of Scientonomy?
+
|Question=What are the normative effects of scientonomy on the process of scientific change?
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Parent Topic=External Influence
+
|Description=How can our accepted scientonomic theories influence the very process they are meant to describe? Specifically, can an acceptance of scientonomy and its becoming part of broad university curricula affect the way scientists do science? If so, wouldn't this be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy, when scientists start acting in accord with the laws of scientonomy even if they weren't doing so prior to learning the laws of scientific change?
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Sinan Karamehmetoglu, Hakob Barseghyan,
+
|Parent Topic=
 +
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Hakob Barseghyan, Sinan Karamehmetoglu
 
|Formulated Year=2018
 
|Formulated Year=2018
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018,
+
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018
 +
|Prehistory=
 +
|History=
 +
|Current View=
 +
|Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Page Status=Stub
 +
|Editor Notes=Why normative in the title?
 +
}}
 +
{{Acceptance Record
 +
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 +
|Accepted From Era=CE
 +
|Accepted From Year=2018
 +
|Accepted From Month=January
 +
|Accepted From Day=18
 +
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 +
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].
 +
|Still Accepted=Yes
 +
|Accepted Until Era=
 +
|Accepted Until Year=
 +
|Accepted Until Month=
 +
|Accepted Until Day=
 +
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 +
|Rejection Indicators=
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:26, 16 October 2022

What are the normative effects of scientonomy on the process of scientific change?

How can our accepted scientonomic theories influence the very process they are meant to describe? Specifically, can an acceptance of scientonomy and its becoming part of broad university curricula affect the way scientists do science? If so, wouldn't this be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy, when scientists start acting in accord with the laws of scientonomy even if they weren't doing so prior to learning the laws of scientific change?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan, Sinan Karamehmetoglu and Ameer Sarwar in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy18 January 2018It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.


Related Topics

This topic is also related to the following topic(s):