Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Method Employment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Question=How do ''methods'' become ''employed'' by a community in theory assessment? | |Question=How do ''methods'' become ''employed'' by a community in theory assessment? | ||
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change | |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change | ||
| − | | | + | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
|Description=When the classical philosophy of science finally came to terms with the fact that methods of theory assessment do in fact change through time, the question became how exactly they change. Since circa 1980, explaining the process of transitions from one employed method to the next has been one of the most challenging tasks for any theory of scientific change. A proper answer to this key question helps to understand one of the key aspects of scientific change. | |Description=When the classical philosophy of science finally came to terms with the fact that methods of theory assessment do in fact change through time, the question became how exactly they change. Since circa 1980, explaining the process of transitions from one employed method to the next has been one of the most challenging tasks for any theory of scientific change. A proper answer to this key question helps to understand one of the key aspects of scientific change. | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 2 September 2016
References
- a b c Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
