Difference between revisions of "Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Title=Deduction of the Non-Empty Mosaic theorem | |Title=Deduction of the Non-Empty Mosaic theorem | ||
|Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) | |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) | ||
− | |Formulation Text= | + | |Formulation Text=The ''non-empty mosaic'' theorem follows deductively from the second law and the third law. |
|Diagram File=Non-empty-mosaic-theorem.jpg | |Diagram File=Non-empty-mosaic-theorem.jpg | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan |
Latest revision as of 10:46, 17 January 2024
Scientific change is impossible in an empty mosaic. It can be deduced from the second law, which asserts that in order to become accepted into the mosaic, a theory is assessed by the method actually employed at the time, and the third law, which asserts that a method becomes employed only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.1
This reason for Non-Empty Mosaic theorem (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1