Difference between revisions of "Outcome Accept"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
 
|Formulated Year=2015
 
|Formulated Year=2015
 +
|Page Status=Needs Editing
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Acceptance Record
 
{{Acceptance Record
Line 14: Line 15:
 
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 
|Acceptance Indicators=That's when the first answer to the question, [[Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015)]] became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself became accepted as legitimate.
 
|Acceptance Indicators=That's when the first answer to the question, [[Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015)]] became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself became accepted as legitimate.
|Still Accepted=Yes
+
|Still Accepted=No
 +
|Accepted Until Era=CE
 +
|Accepted Until Year=2017
 +
|Accepted Until Month=November
 +
|Accepted Until Day=29
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 +
|Rejection Indicators=The term itself became rejected as a result of the acceptance of [[Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)|the new taxonomy]] by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan. For details, refer to [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0004|the modification]].
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 18:17, 29 November 2017

How should the theory assessment outcome accept be defined?

As one of possible theory assessment outcomes, this outcome must be properly defined. Thus, what does it mean to say that a theory's assessment outcome was "Accept".

In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016That's when the first answer to the question, Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015) became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself became accepted as legitimate.No29 November 2017The term itself became rejected as a result of the acceptance of the new taxonomy by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan. For details, refer to the modification.

All Theories

The following theories have attempted to answer this question:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015)An outcome of theory assessment which prescribes that the theory must be accepted.2015

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
CommunityTheoryAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyOutcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015)1 January 201629 November 2017

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.


Related Topics