Philosophy of Science - Demarcation

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Revision as of 00:49, 19 January 2018 by Maxim Mirkin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of demarcation?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy18 January 2018It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.


Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of External Influence - Application.

This topic is also related to the following topic(s):

References

  1. a b  Laudan, Larry. (1983) The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. In Cohen and Laudan (Eds.) (1983), 111-127.
  2. ^ Carnap (1936a) 
  3. ^  Popper, Karl. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson & Co.
  4. ^  Lakatos, Imre. (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Lakatos (1978a), 8-101.
  5. ^  Kuhn, Thomas. (1970) Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? In Lakatos and Musgrave (Eds.) (1970), 1-20.
  6. ^  Feyerabend, Paul. (1975) Against Method. New Left Books.