Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of Science - Scientific Progress"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Topic |Question=Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of relativism? |Topic Type=Descriptive |Parent Topic=External Influence - Application |Authors List=Sinan Karam...")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Topic
 
{{Topic
|Question=Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of relativism?
+
|Question=Can scientonomy as a descriptive empirical science of science be applied to solve ''the problem of scientific progress/relativism''?
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Parent Topic=External Influence - Application
+
|Description=The task of scientonomy is to describe and explain how mosaics actually change through time. As such, answering the traditional philosophical question of progress/relativism  is not within the scope of scientonomy, i.e. it is not the task of scientonomy to determine whether science progresses towards an increasingly correct description of the world. The question is whether the empirical findings of descriptive scientonomy can by potentially applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism.
 +
|Parent Topic=Application of Scientonomy to Philosophy of Science
 
|Authors List=Sinan Karamehmetoglu,
 
|Authors List=Sinan Karamehmetoglu,
 
|Formulated Year=2018
 
|Formulated Year=2018
 
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018,
 
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018,
 +
|Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative,
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Page Status=Stub
 +
}}
 +
{{Acceptance Record
 +
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 +
|Accepted From Era=CE
 +
|Accepted From Year=2018
 +
|Accepted From Month=January
 +
|Accepted From Day=18
 +
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 +
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].
 +
|Still Accepted=Yes
 +
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 18:45, 17 February 2018

Can scientonomy as a descriptive empirical science of science be applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism?

The task of scientonomy is to describe and explain how mosaics actually change through time. As such, answering the traditional philosophical question of progress/relativism is not within the scope of scientonomy, i.e. it is not the task of scientonomy to determine whether science progresses towards an increasingly correct description of the world. The question is whether the empirical findings of descriptive scientonomy can by potentially applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Sinan Karamehmetoglu in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy18 January 2018It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.


Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of Application of Scientonomy to Philosophy of Science.

This topic is also related to the following topic(s):