Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Verdict Rationale" with value "While the notions of ''singular'' and ''multiple'' authority delegation didn't cause much controversy, the notions of ''hierarchical'' and ''non-hierarchical'' authority delegation gave rise to notable disagreement among scientonomists. As a result, the modification was in discussion for about a year and a half.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c1]]</sup> Eventually, a consensus emerged mostly as a result of offline (in-person) discussion meetings. It was agreed that "for decisions that are not rote and routine, it seems highly unlikely that a pre-established hierarchy of authority delegation does or could exist, nor could a pre-established belief that all authorities should be given equal weight".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-60|c2]]</sup> However, it was also agreed that Loiselle's study "have identified at least one aspect of hierarchical authority delegation in epistemic communities",<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-62|c3]]</sup> for "there seem to be instances where some experts occupy privileged positions in the eyes of those delegating authority" and that "alone is sufficient to suggest that hierarchies of authority delegation exists, regardless of of how transient or fixed they might be".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c4]]</sup>". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 2 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

    • Modification:Sciento-2017-0007  + (While the notions of ''singular'' and ''muWhile the notions of ''singular'' and ''multiple'' authority delegation didn't cause much controversy, the notions of ''hierarchical'' and ''non-hierarchical'' authority delegation gave rise to notable disagreement among scientonomists. As a result, the modification was in discussion for about a year and a half.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c1]]</sup> Eventually, a consensus emerged mostly as a result of offline (in-person) discussion meetings. It was agreed that "for decisions that are not rote and routine, it seems highly unlikely that a pre-established hierarchy of authority delegation does or could exist, nor could a pre-established belief that all authorities should be given equal weight".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-60|c2]]</sup> However, it was also agreed that Loiselle's study "have identified at least one aspect of hierarchical authority delegation in epistemic communities",<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-62|c3]]</sup> for "there seem to be instances where some experts occupy privileged positions in the eyes of those delegating authority" and that "alone is sufficient to suggest that hierarchies of authority delegation exists, regardless of of how transient or fixed they might be".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c4]]</sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c4]]</sup>)