The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Revision as of 03:05, 5 September 2016 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

References

  1. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  2. ^  Carnielli, Walter and Marcos, Joano. (2001) Ex Contradictione Non Sequitur Quodlibet. Bulletin of Advanced Reasoning and Knowledge 1, 89-109.
  3. ^  Newton, Isaac. (1687) Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy). Pepys, London.
  4. ^  Smith, George. (2009) Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathmatica. In Zalta (Ed.) (2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/newton-principia/.
  5. ^  Popper, Karl. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson & Co.
  6. ^ Neurath (1973) 
  7. ^ Quine and Ullian (1978) 
  8. ^  Harder, Rory. (2013) Scientific Mosaics and the Law of Consistency. Unpublished manuscript.
  9. ^  Fine, Aurthur. (2013) The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. In Zalta (Ed.) (2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/qt-epr/.
  10. ^  Fraser, Patrick and Sarwar, Ameer. (2018) A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change. Scientonomy 2, 67-82. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31278.
  11. ^  Priest, Graham; Tanaka, Koji and Weber, Zachary. (2015) Paraconsistent Logic. In Zalta (Ed.) (2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.
  12. ^ Bueno et al (1998) 
  13. ^  Einstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris and Rosen, Nathan. (1935) Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review 47, 777-780.
  14. ^ Meheus (2003) 
  15. ^ Meheus(2003) 
  16. ^ Smith(1988) 
  17. ^ Smith (1988)