Difference between revisions of "Theory Acceptance"
m (→Current View) |
m (→History) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | Prior to | + | Prior to 2016, the definition of "[[Theory|theory]]" included only [[Theory#Descriptive and Normative|descriptive]] theories. As a result, "acceptance" only concerned the best available descriptions: |
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Acceptance_Definition.png|center|273px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, after the [[Modification:Sebastien-2016-002|2016 reintroduction]] of [[Theory#Descriptive and Normative|normative]] propositions into the concept of "theory" by Sebastien, the definition of acceptance was changed and it now concerns both descriptive and normative propositions.[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]] | ||
== Current View == | == Current View == | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 11 July 2016
A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object. "Acceptance" is not to be confused with "use" or "pursuit".
Contents
Prehistory
Prehistory here
History
Prior to 2016, the definition of "theory" included only descriptive theories. As a result, "acceptance" only concerned the best available descriptions:
However, after the 2016 reintroduction of normative propositions into the concept of "theory" by Sebastien, the definition of acceptance was changed and it now concerns both descriptive and normative propositions.1
Current View
Currently, a theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object.1
This definition allows for both descriptive and normative propositions to be accepted into a mosaic.
Acceptance, Use, and Pursuit
Open Questions
• Question 1
• Question 2
Related Articles
Notes
References
- a b Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
