Associations of Delineating Theory
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
How is the class of delineating theory associated with other classes (and itself)? What aggregation, composition, or other association relations can exist between delineating theories, as well as between a delineating theory and instances of other classes?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Cyrus Al-Zayadi in 2021. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The following association of Delineating Theory is currently accepted in Scientonomy:
- A discipline has one delineating theory.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 August 2021 | The question of Associations of Delineating Theory became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Delineating Theory. This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:
If a theory concerning the associations of a delineating theory is missing, please click here to add it.
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Discipline Has Delineating Theory (Patton-Al-Zayadi-2021) | A discipline has one delineating theory. | 2021 |
Accepted Direct Answers
The following theories have been accepted as direct answers to this question:
Community | Theory | Formulation | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Discipline Has Delineating Theory (Patton-Al-Zayadi-2021) | A discipline has one delineating theory. | 21 February 2024 |
Suggested Modifications
Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Date Assessed | Verdict | Verdict Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2021-0006 | Scientonomy | 1 August 2021 | Accept new definitions of subquestion, core question, core theory, discipline, delineating theory, subdiscipline, and discipline acceptance. | 21 February 2024 | Accepted | Prior to the 2024 workshop, Hakob Barseghyan commented on the encyclopedia indicating his support for accepting this modification and noted its potential to underpin further work on discipline dynamics. In fact, a significant amount of observational scientonomy work has been carried out in the past few years (including the paper on the rejection of alchemy by Friesen and Patton (2023),1 as well as some more recent papers) that presupposes the acceptance of these definitions, despite the fact that the modification containing them formally remains open. There was very little discussion about the modification, beyond raising points for the community to look forward to in the future, like a brief discussion between Jamie Shaw and Paul Patton about the need for more research on the difference between disciplines and disciplinary communities. The modification was accepted unanimously with 18 votes. |
Current View
In Scientonomy, the following association of Delineating Theory is currently accepted:
- A discipline has one delineating theory.
Related Topics
References
- ^ Friesen, Izzy and Patton, Paul. (2023) Discipline Dynamics of Chymistry and Rejection of Alchemy. Scientonomy 5, 93-110. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/42268.