What is discipline acceptance? How should it be defined?
An epistemic agent can accept or reject a discipline. It is important, therefore, to understand what this acceptance amounts to, i.e. what happens at the level of individual epistemic elements when an agent accepts a discipline.
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 August 2021||This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community.||Yes|
|Discipline Acceptance (Patton-Al-Zayadi-2021)||A discipline is said to be accepted by an epistemic agent if that agent accepts the core questions specified in the discipline’s delineating theory as well as the delineating theory itself.||2021|
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2021-0006||Scientonomy||1 August 2021||Accept new definitions of subquestion, core question, core theory, discipline, delineating theory, subdiscipline, and discipline acceptance.||Open|
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of discipline acceptances.
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of a discipline acceptance.
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of a discipline acceptance.
No associations of a discipline acceptance are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of a discipline acceptance is missing, please add it here.
If a question concerning the dynamics of a discipline acceptance is missing, please add it here.
This term is also related to the following topic(s):