Disjointness of Implicit

What other classes is the class of implicit disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with implicit?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Implicit in Scientonomy.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record of the Question

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	28 December 2018	The question of Disjointness of Implicit became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Implicit. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community.	Yes

All Direct Answers

No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia. If a theory stating the disjointness of implicit with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Direct Answers

According to our records, no direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications concerning a direct answer to this question.

Current View

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Implicit.