Existence of Explicable-Implicit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Does explicable-implicit exist?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no accepted claims concerning the existence of Explicable-Implicit in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | The question of Existence of Explicable-Implicit became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Explicable-Implicit. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
To add the positive answer to the question, click here. To add the negative answer to the question, click here.
Accepted Direct Answers
According to our records, no direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications concerning a direct answer to this question.
Current View
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted claims concerning the existence of Explicable-Implicit.