Does question acceptance exist?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by William Rawleigh in 2018.
The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. "There is such a thing as question acceptance." is currently accepted in Scientonomy.
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
|Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|12 May 2018||Existence of Question Acceptance became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Question Acceptance. This is when Rawleigh's The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change that offered a definition of question acceptance was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community.||Yes|
The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:
To add the negative answer to the question, click here
The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:
|Modification||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2018-0003||12 May 2018||Accept that the epistemic stance that can be taken by an epistemic agent towards a question is question acceptance (the opposite is unacceptance), where question acceptance is defined as "a question is said to be accepted if it is taken as a legitimate topic of inquiry".||Accepted||It was noted that "the whole point of adding questions to the ontology of epistemic elements was that we can legitimately speak of a question being accepted by a certain agent at a certain time".c1 The discussion also revealed a need to distinguish "a situation where no consensus exists from a situation where a consensus exists that a question is illegitimate".c2 In other words, "just as question acceptance, theory acceptance too seems to allow for three values: (clearly) accepted; (clearly) unaccepted; no consensus".c3 Thus, a new question was suggested concerning the binary character of epistemic stances: "are all epistemic stances binary, or do they allow for more than two values?"c4||1 November 2018|
In Scientonomy, the following claim concerning the existence of Question Acceptance is currently accepted:
In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is Question Acceptance Exists.
Question Acceptance Exists states: "There is such a thing as question acceptance." Rawleigh emphasized that the process of scientific change involves not only theories and methods but also questions.1