Explicable-Implicit

What is explicable-implicit knowledge? How should it be defined?

There seem to be implicit knowledge that is capable of being explicitly formulated. The definition of explicable-implicit is meant to capture that category.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available definition of the term. It is defined as: "Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent."

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this term (it includes all the instances when the term was accepted as a part of a community's taxonomy):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	28 December 2018	The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community.	Yes

All Theories

The following definitions of the term have been suggested:

Theory	Formulation	Formulated In
Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent.	2018

If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following definitions of the term have been accepted:

Community	Theory	Accepted From	Accepted Until
Scientonomy	Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	1 September 2019

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning this term:

Modification	Community	Date Suggested	Summary	Verdict	Verdict Rationale	Date Assessed
Sciento-2018-0011	Scientonomy	28 December 2018	Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable.	Accepted	The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2	1 September 2019

Current Definition

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018).

Explicable-Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Propositional knowledge that hasn’t been openly formulated by the agent." This category encompasses that knowledge which hasn't been openly formulated by the agent but can, in principle, be open formulated. As such the category is agent-relative. The definition was first suggested by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in their The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change1 and was restated by Mirkin in his The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic.

Ontology

Existence

There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of explicable-implicits.

Disjointness

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Explicable-Implicit.

Subtypes

No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of an explicable-implicit.

Supertypes

No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of an explicable-implicit.

Associations

No associations of an explicable-implicit are currently accepted.

If a question concerning the ontology of an explicable-implicit is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

If a question concerning the dynamics of an explicable-implicit is missing, please add it here.