Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019)
An attempt to answer the question of Workflow - Goals of Peer Review which states "The goal of peer reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for pursuitworthiness rather than acceptability."
Suggestions To Accept
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2019-0001||Scientonomy||22 December 2019||Accept that the goal of peer-reviews in the scientonomic workflow is evaluation for pursuitworthiness rather than acceptability.||Open|
Goals of Peer Review - Pursuitworthiness (Shaw-Barseghyan-2019) is an attempt to answer the following question: Should peer reviewers evaluate a submitted paper for the pursuitworthiness or acceptability of the content of the paper?
See Workflow - Goals of Peer Review for more details.
In the scientonomic workflow, the goals of peer review are to assesses a paper for pursuitworthiness of the modifications suggested in the paper. Thus, peer reviewers should not evaluate submissions for acceptability, but only for pursuitworthiness.
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
- Shaw, Jamie and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2019) Problems and Prospects with the Scientonomic Workflow. Scientonomy 3, 1-14. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/33509.