What is implication? How should it be defined?
The notion of implication figures prominently in many scientonomic discussions. A proper definition of the term is required.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Kye Palider in 2019.
|Implication (Palider-2019)||A logical transition from one theory to another.||2019|
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2019-0009||Scientonomy||23 December 2019||Accept the definition of implication as a logical transition from one theory to another.||Open|
There is currently no accepted definition of the term.
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of implications.
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of an implication.
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of an implication.
No associations of an implication are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of an implication is missing, please add it here.
If a question concerning the dynamics of an implication is missing, please add it here.