What is individual level? How should it be defined?
Individual level is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. When analyzing the role of the individual level throughout the scientific change it is important to look at individual figures throughout the history of science. A lot of the times their views affected in a way the scientific mosaic of the time and their work allows us to understand the possible cause of the shift in methods and theories.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment.
Prior to the 20th century, epistemology of science has dealt primarily with how individuals produce and evaluate knowledge.1 This focus on the knowledge of the individual characterizes both the empiricist tradition of Locke and Hume, and the rationalist tradition of Descartes and Leibniz.1
Despite the growing attention to the knowledge of social epistemic agents, many 20th century authors still focused on the belief systems of individual scientists (e.g. Feyerabend's focus on Galileo).2) Even in the famous Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VPI) project which aimed at testing theoretical claims against the historical data, most authors focused largely on individuals. For example, Finocchiaro sets to test some general claims bout the process of scientific change by focusing on the belief system of Galileo and his acceptance of Copernicanism.3
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 January 2016||Yes|
|Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015)||The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment.||2015|
|Community||Theory||Accepted From||Accepted Until|
|Scientonomy||Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015)||1 January 2016|
Individual Level (Barseghyan-2015) states: "The level of the beliefs of the individual scientist about the world and the rules she employs in theory assessment."
By the individual level Barseghyan means an "individual scientist who has her own set of ideas and beliefs about the world, and employs certain methods which might be different than the accepted methods of the time".4
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of individual levels.
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of an individual level.
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of an individual level.
No associations of an individual level are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of an individual level is missing, please add it here.
If a question concerning the dynamics of an individual level is missing, please add it here.
This term is also related to the following topic(s):
- Longino, Helen. (2016) The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge. In Zalta (Ed.) (2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/scientific-knowledge-social/.
- Feyerabend, Paul. (1975) Against Method. New Left Books.
- Donovan, Arthur; Laudan, Larry and Laudan, Rachel. (Eds.). (1988) Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.