Modification talk:Sciento-2018-0007

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commenting on this modification is closed; the modification is accepted.

Paul Patton

58 months ago
Score 0
I support the acceptance of this definition of 'definition'. The main feature that makes 'definition' potentially problematic is that it is being treated as a sub-type of theory, despite the fact that there is a controversy over whether definitions can have a truth value. It seems reasonable, for example, to suppose that they are conventions, for which no empirical truth value is possible. Barseghyan 2018 argues that the question of most relevance to scientonomy is whether definitions can be accepted or not accepted by an epistemic agent. This seems clearly to be a question that has an answer, for any given definition. Thus, despite the problems, I believe this definition of 'definition' warrants acceptance.

Hakob Barseghyan

51 months ago
Score 0
This is to record that the consensus concerning this modification emerged primarily off-line, outside of this discussion page. The consensus has manifested on several occasions, including the first scientonomy conference in May 2019 in Toronto.

You are not allowed to post comments.