Modification talk:Sciento-2019-0002

Commenting on this modification is closed; the modification is accepted.

Sort by date Sort by score

Enable comment auto-refresher

You are ignoring the author of this comment

Show comment | Manage ignore list

Ameer Sarwar

46 months ago

Score 0

I think this definitely provides a much needed incentive. I think it is better if the work is published in edited collections than in the scientonomy journal. There are two reasons for this preference: (1) Edited collections broaden the audience of the scientonomic work. People who do not read ordinary scientonomy journal are unlikely to read a commentary on specific modifications in that journal. Rather, having edited collections, which I presume will be published by external publishers, increases the likelihood of attracting people who may not otherwise find this material. (2) From the point of view of providing incentive to contributors, I recommend that edited collections are a better option. This is because while commentaries in the scientonomy journal may initially motivate people, after one or two articles most people would not continue participating. Instead, if edited collections (by external publishers) are where the co-authored commentaries/ articles will be published, then I think that would provide a larger incentive.

Permalink

You are not allowed to post comments.