Mosaic Merge
What is mosaic merge? How should it be defined?
Mosaic merge is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- A scientific change where two mosaics turn into one united mosaic.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Term
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | Yes |
All Definitions
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Mosaic Merge (Barseghyan-2015) | A scientific change where two mosaics turn into one united mosaic. | 2015 |
Accepted Definitions
Community | Theory | Formulation | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Mosaic Merge (Barseghyan-2015) | A scientific change where two mosaics turn into one united mosaic. | 1 January 2016 |
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Mosaic Merge (Barseghyan-2015).
Mosaic Merge (Barseghyan-2015) states: "A scientific change where two mosaics turn into one united mosaic."
According to Barseghyan (2015), for mosaics to merge, that is, to "turn into one united mosaic," there must first exist (at least) two distinct mosaics. This necessarily means that there are elements which are present in one mosaic but absent in the other. "To use the language of set theory," Barseghyan writes, "these are the elements that constitute the so-called symmetric difference of two mosaics [...] Therefore, in order for the two mosaics to merge into one, these elements should either be rejected in both or accepted in both, so that the differences between the two are resolved".1
Ontology
Existence
In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as a mosaic merge."
Subtypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Mosaic Merge.
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Mosaic Merge.
Associations
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Mosaic Merge.
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Mosaic Merge.
If a question concerning the ontology of a mosaic merge is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of a mosaic merge is missing, please add it here.
Related Topics
This term is also related to the following topic(s):
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.