Property:Formulation Text

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a property of type Text.

Showing 20 pages using this property.
A
Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''acceptable'' or ''unacceptable.''  +
Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''acceptable'' or ''unacceptable.''  +
A group that does not have a collective intentionality.  +
A group that does not have a collective intentionality.  +
The commentators of suggested modifications are allowed to suggest reformulations of the original formulations in the comments. By default, the new formulation should bear the original author’s name, unless the author decides to give credit to those who significantly contributed to the new reformulation.  +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.  +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.  +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.  +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory.  +
A [[Community|community]] can [[Authority Delegation|delegate authority]] to another community.  +
A [[Question|question]] can presuppose [[Theory|theories]]. A [[Theory|theory]] is an answer to a [[Question|question]].   +
A [[Question|question]] can presuppose [[Theory|theories]]. A [[Theory|theory]] is an answer to a [[Question|question]].   +
The employment of new methods can ''be'' but is not ''necessarily'' a result of the acceptance of new theories.  +
Community A is said to be delegating authority over topic ''x'' to community B ''iff'' (1) community A accepts that community B is an expert on topic ''x'' and (2) community A will accept a theory on topic ''x'' if community B says so.  +
Epistemic agent A is said to be delegating authority over question ''x'' to epistemic agent B ''iff'' (1) agent A accepts that agent B is an expert on question ''x'' and (2) agent A will accept a theory answering question ''x'' if agent B says so.  +
Epistemic agent A is said to be delegating authority over question ''x'' to epistemic agent B ''iff'' (1) agent A accepts that agent B is an expert on question ''x'' and (2) agent A will accept a theory answering question ''x'' if agent B says so.  +
B
Only a community can be a bearer of a scientific mosaic.  +
C
If an accepted theory is taken as the final truth, it will always remain accepted; no new theory on the subject can ever be accepted.  +
A modification should be accepted by default if there are no objections within a 90-day period following its publication.  +
The verdict on a suggested modification should be decided by a communal vote that will follow the discussion period.  +