Scope of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an answer to the question Scope of Scientonomy that states "Scientonomy ought to explain changes in a scientific mosaic, including changes from one accepted theory to the next and one employed method to the next."

Scope of Scientonomy was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.

Scientonomic History

Note that at the time of this stipulation, the name "scientonomy" was not in use. Thus, this original stipulation of the scope of scientonomy talks about "TSC" as opposed to "scientonomy".

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this theory:
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016The theory was introduced by Barseghyan in The Laws of Scientific Change pp. 3-80 and became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.Yes

Question Answered

Scope of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to theory the following question: What types of phenomena should a scientonomic theory account for?

See Scope of Scientonomy for more details.


According to Barseghyan's initial stipulation, a scientonomic theory should:

  • be a descriptive theory that explain changes in a scientific mosaic and not to prescribe any methods of theory appraisal (i.e. it should not be confused with normative methodologies);
  • explain how theories become accepted as opposed to explaining how theories are constructed (generated), what makes them useful or pursuit-worthy.
  • focus on changes at the community level and not those in individual belief systems (although an actual TSC may turn out to be applicable to changes at the individual level);
  • account for each and every change in a mosaic, regardless of its time period, scientific field, or scale.


No reasons are indicated for this theory.

If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.

Questions About This Theory

There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.

If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.


  1. ^  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.