Subtypes of Group
What are the subtypes of a group?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Nicholas Overgaard in 2016. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The subtypes of Group currently accepted in Scientonomy are:
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 19 May 2017 | The question of Subtypes of Group became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Group. The question became accepted with the publication of Overgaard's A Taxonomy for Social Agents of Scientific Change. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Accidental Group Is a Subtype of Group (Overgaard-2017) | Accidental Group is a subtype of Group, i.e. group is a supertype of accidental group. | 2017 |
Community Is a Subtype of Group (Overgaard-2017) | Community is a subtype of Group, i.e. group is a supertype of community. | 2017 |
Accepted Direct Answers
Community | Theory | Formulation | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Accidental Group Is a Subtype of Group (Overgaard-2017) | Accidental Group is a subtype of Group, i.e. group is a supertype of accidental group. | 2 February 2018 | |
Scientonomy | Community Is a Subtype of Group (Overgaard-2017) | Community is a subtype of Group, i.e. group is a supertype of community. | 2 February 2018 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Date Assessed | Verdict | Verdict Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2017-0012 | Scientonomy | 19 May 2017 | Accept a new taxonomy for group and its two sub-types - accidental group, and community. | 2 February 2018 | Accepted | A consensus has emerged after a long discussion that the distinction and the respective definitions should be accepted. It was noted that "these formulations tend to be the starting point for so many of our discussions"c1 and that "despite all disagreements that this taxonomy causes, it is actually accepted by the community".c2 Yet, it was also indicated that whereas the definition of group as "two or more people that share a characteristic" is the best we have at the moment, it may be potentially necessary to pursue the idea of redefining it as "one or more people..." to allow for one-scientist communities.c3 Finally, while a question was raised whether there is any "value in defining accidental groups as something separate from groups",c4 it was eventually agreed that it is important to draw "a clear distinction between the two kinds of groups as accidental groups and communities".c5 |
Current View
In Scientonomy, the accepted subtypes of Group are:
Accidental Group Is a Subtype of Group (Overgaard-2017) states: "Accidental Group is a subtype of Group, i.e. group is a supertype of accidental group."
Overgaard differentiates between groups that do and do not have a collective intentionality; the former are communities, the latter are accidental groups.1
Community Is a Subtype of Group (Overgaard-2017) states: "Community is a subtype of Group, i.e. group is a supertype of community."
Overgaard differentiates between groups that do and do not have a collective intentionality; the former are communities, the latter are accidental groups.1
Related Topics
References
- a b Overgaard, Nicholas. (2017) A Taxonomy for the Social Agents of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 55-62. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28234.