What is sufficient reason? How should it be defined?
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Kye Palider in 2019.
|Sufficient Reason (Palider-2019)||An agent takes theory A to be a sufficient reason for (accepting) theory B iff the following four conditions are met:
(1) The agent accepts A.
(2) The agent accepts that A → B.
(3) The agent employs ε.(4) The agent accepts (ε, A, A→B) →ε (Should accept B).
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2019-0010||Scientonomy||23 December 2019||Accept the new definitions of sufficient reason, reason, support, and normative inference.||Open|
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of sufficient reasons.
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of a sufficient reason.
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of a sufficient reason.
No associations of a sufficient reason are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of a sufficient reason is missing, please add it here.
If a question concerning the dynamics of a sufficient reason is missing, please add it here.