Sufficient Reason (Palider-2019)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A definition of Sufficient Reason that states "An agent takes theory A to be a sufficient reason for (accepting) theory B iff the following four conditions are met:

(1) The agent accepts A.

(2) The agent accepts that AB.

(3) The agent employs ε.

(4) The agent accepts (ε, A, AB) →ε (Should accept B)."

Sufficient Reason (Palider-2019).png

This definition of Sufficient Reason was formulated by Kye Palider in 2019.1

History

Acceptance Record

This theory has never been accepted.

Suggestions To Accept

Here are all the modifications where the acceptance of this theory has been suggested:
ModificationCommunityDate SuggestedSummaryVerdictVerdict RationaleDate Assessed
Sciento-2019-0010Scientonomy23 December 2019Accept the new definitions of sufficient reason, reason, support, and normative inference.Open

Question Answered

Sufficient Reason (Palider-2019) is an attempt to answer the following question: What is sufficient reason? How should it be defined?

See Sufficient Reason for more details.

Description

A Sufficient Reason is an agent's actual reason for accepting a theory. It is sufficient as it guarantees, by the Sufficient Reason theorem (Palider-2019), that an agent accept the theory for which there is a sufficient reason. A sufficient reason aims to separate the components by which an agent accepts a theory: into acceptance of the theory that serves as a reason, the acceptance of Implication (Palider-2019), the employment of a method, and the acceptance of Normative Inference (Palider-2019). A sufficient reason is to be contrasted with a Reason (Palider-2019) as it further involves the acceptance of the reason. Some questions surrounding acceptance without a sufficient reason remain to be explored (Theory Acceptance without Sufficient Reason).


References

  1. ^  Palider, Kye. (2019) Reasons in the Scientonomic Ontology. Scientonomy 3, 15-31. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/33557.