Supertypes of Implicit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What are the supertypes of an implicit?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The following supertype of Implicit is currently accepted in Scientonomy:
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | Supertypes of Implicit became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Implicit. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:
If a theory concerning the supertypes of an implicit is missing, please click here to add it.
| Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
|---|---|---|
| Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) | Implicit is a subtype of Epistemic Element, i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of implicit. | 2018 |
Accepted Theories
The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
| Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) | 28 September 2022 |
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
In Scientonomy, the following supertype of Implicit is currently accepted:
Implicit Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Mirkin-2018) states: "Implicit is a subtype of Epistemic Element, i.e. epistemic element is a supertype of implicit."
