Supertypes of Inexplicable

What are the supertypes of inexplicable?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The following supertype of Inexplicable is currently accepted in Scientonomy:

• Implicit

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record of the Question

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	28 December 2018	The question of Supertypes of Inexplicable became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Inexplicable. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community.	Yes

All Direct Answers

The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:

Theory	Formulation	Formulated In
Inexplicable Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	Inexplicable is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of inexplicable.	2018

If a theory concerning the supertypes of inexplicable is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Direct Answers

The following theories have been accepted as direct answers to this question:

Community	Theory	Formulation	Accepted From	Accepted Until
Scientonomy	Inexplicable Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	Inexplicable is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of inexplicable.	1 September 2019

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:

Modification	Community	Date Suggested	Summary	Date Assessed	Verdict	Verdict Rationale
Sciento-2018-0011	Scientonomy	28 December 2018	Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable.	1 September 2019	Accepted	The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2

Current View

In Scientonomy, the following supertype of Inexplicable is currently accepted:

• Implicit

Inexplicable Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Inexplicable is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of inexplicable."

Barseghyan and Mirkin suggest that what is implicit may or may not be explicable.12