Tautological Status of the Zeroth Law
From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Is the Zeroth law a tautology?
Is the Zeroth law a tautology or does it allow for different compatibility criteria? Has our compatibility criteria become vacuous or trivial? How changeable are compatibility criteria?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Jennifer Whyte in 2017. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.
Contents
History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 April 2016 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2016. | Yes |
All Theories
According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.
If a theory on this descriptive question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This topic is a sub-topic of Mechanism of Compatibility.
Contributors
Hakob Barseghyan (19.6%), Jacob MacKinnon (80.4%)
