Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,042
edits
Changes
The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is Not Tautological (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) (view source)
Revision as of 23:20, 19 January 2023
, 23:20, 19 January 2023Created page with "{{Theory |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Theory Type=Descriptive |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)..."
{{Theory
|Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
|Theory Type=Descriptive
|Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
|Predicate=is tautological
|Title=
|Alternate Titles=
|Title Formula=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is <Object>
|Text Formula=The law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 is <object>.
|Object=Not Tautological
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser
|Formulated Year=2018
|Formulation File=
|Description=[[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)|The law of theory demarcation]] tries to provide a mechanism of how the scientific status of theories changes overtime. The assessment outcomes of the law (satisfied, unsatisfied, and inconclusive) are ''logically'' separated from their consequences. In particular, the assessment outcome of conclusively satisfying the demarcation criteria leads to a theory being scientific, the assessment outcome of conclusively not satisfying the criteria lead to the theory being unscientific, and the final inconclusive outcome can lead to the theory being scientific, unscientific, or uncertain.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]]
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}
|Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
|Theory Type=Descriptive
|Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
|Predicate=is tautological
|Title=
|Alternate Titles=
|Title Formula=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is <Object>
|Text Formula=The law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 is <object>.
|Object=Not Tautological
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser
|Formulated Year=2018
|Formulation File=
|Description=[[The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)|The law of theory demarcation]] tries to provide a mechanism of how the scientific status of theories changes overtime. The assessment outcomes of the law (satisfied, unsatisfied, and inconclusive) are ''logically'' separated from their consequences. In particular, the assessment outcome of conclusively satisfying the demarcation criteria leads to a theory being scientific, the assessment outcome of conclusively not satisfying the criteria lead to the theory being unscientific, and the final inconclusive outcome can lead to the theory being scientific, unscientific, or uncertain.[[CiteRef::Sarwar and Fraser (2018)]]
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}