Outcome Not Accept
How should the theory assessment outcome not accept be defined?
As one of possible theory assessment outcomes, this outcome must be properly defined. Thus, what does it mean to say that a theory's assessment outcome was "Not Accept".
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | That's when the first answer to the question, Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015) became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself became accepted as legitimate. | No | 29 November 2017 | The term itself became rejected as a result of the acceptance of the new taxonomy by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan. For details, refer to the modification. |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015) | An outcome of theory assessment which prescribes that the theory must not be accepted. | 2015 |
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015) | 1 January 2016 | 29 November 2017 |
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of outcome not accepts.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of an outcome not accept.
Supertypes
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of an outcome not accept.
Associations
No associations of an outcome not accept are currently accepted.
Disjointness
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
If a question concerning the ontology of an outcome not accept is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of an outcome not accept is missing, please add it here.