Difference between revisions of "Corradini and O'Connor (2010)"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Bibliographic Record |Title=Emergence in Science and Philosophy |Resource Type=collection |Author=Antonella Corradini, Timothy O'Connor |Year=2010 |Cover Image= |Abstract=Th...")
 
m (Hakob Barseghyan moved page Corradini and O'Connor 2010 to Corradini and O'Connor (2010) without leaving a redirect: brackets were missing)
 

Latest revision as of 17:04, 30 December 2020

Title Emergence in Science and Philosophy
Resource Type collection
Author(s) Timothy O'Connor, Antonella Corradini
Year 2010
Publisher Routledge
ISBN 9780415802161

Abstract

The concept of emergence has seen a significant resurgence in philosophy and the sciences, yet debates regarding emergentist and reductionist visions of the natural world continue to be hampered by imprecision or ambiguity. Emergent phenomena are said to arise out of and be sustained by more basic phenomena, while at the same time exerting a "top-down" control upon those very sustaining processes. To some critics, this has the air of magic, as it seems to suggest a kind of circular causality. Other critics deem the concept of emergence to be objectionably anti-naturalistic. Objections such as these have led many thinkers to construe emergent phenomena instead as coarse-grained patterns in the world that, while calling for distinctive concepts, do not "disrupt" the ordinary dynamics of the finer-grained (more fundamental) levels. Yet, reconciling emergence with a (presumed) pervasive causal continuity at the fundamental level can seem to deflate emergence of its initially profound significance. This basic problematic is mirrored by similar controversy over how best to characterize the opposite systematizing impulse, most commonly given an equally evocative but vague term, "reductionism." The original essays in this volume help to clarify the alternatives: inadequacies in some older formulations and arguments are exposed and new lines of argument on behalf the two visions are advanced.

Articles in This Collection

Here are the articles from this collection listed in the bibliographic records:

To add an article in this collection, enter the citation key below:

 

Citation keys normally include author names followed by the publication year in brackets. E.g. Lakatos (1970), Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (1935), Musgrave and Pigden (2016), Kuhn (1970a), Lakatos and Musgrave (Eds.) (1970). If a record with that citation key already exists, you will be sent to a form to edit that page.