Disjointness of Accidental Group
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What other classes is the class of accidental group disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with accidental group?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Nicholas Overgaard in 2016. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Accidental Group in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 19 May 2017 | Disjointness of Accidental Group became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Accidental Group. The question became accepted with the publication of Overgaard's A Taxonomy for Social Agents of Scientific Change. | Yes |
All Theories
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of accidental group with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Accidental Group.
