Disjointness of Epistemic Element
Revision as of 21:41, 22 December 2022 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Ontological Topic |Term=Epistemic Element |Ontological Question Type=Disjointness |Description= |Prehistory= |History= |Current View= |Page Status=Stub |Editor Notes= }}")
What other classes is the class of epistemic element disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with epistemic element?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Epistemic Element in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | Disjointness of Epistemic Element became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Epistemic Element. The term epistemic element has been de facto accepted since the inception of the community, as indicated by the fact that there has been an accepted ontology of epistemic elements from the outset. | Yes |
All Theories
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of epistemic element with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Epistemic Element.
