Disjointness of Error

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Revision as of 21:12, 24 December 2022 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Ontological Topic |Term=Error |Ontological Question Type=Disjointness |Description= |Prehistory= |History= |Current View= |Page Status=Stub |Editor Notes= }}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What other classes is the class of error disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with error?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Sarah Machado-Marques in 2019. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Error in Scientonomy.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 August 2021Disjointness of Error became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Error. This is when Machado-Marques and Patton's Scientific Error and Error Handling that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community.Yes

All Theories

No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia. If a theory stating the disjointness of error with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Error.


Related Topics