Epistemic Stance

What is epistemic stance? How should it be defined?

In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this term (it includes all the instances when the term was accepted as a part of a community's taxonomy):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	1 January 2016	The term stance became accepted with the inception of the community.	Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no definition of the term has been suggested.If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no definition of the term has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this term.

Current Definition

While the term is currently lacking an explicit definition, it is roughly understood as the attitude of an epistemic agent towards an epistemic element.

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.

Ontology

Existence

In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as an epistemic stance."

Disjointness

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Epistemic Stance.

Subtypes

In Scientonomy, the accepted subtypes of Epistemic Stance are:

• Theory Use
• Theory Pursuit
• Question Acceptance
• Norm Employment
• Compatibility
• Theory Acceptance

Supertypes

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Epistemic Stance.

Associations

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Epistemic Stance.

If a question concerning the ontology of an epistemic stance is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

If a question concerning the dynamics of an epistemic stance is missing, please add it here.