Open main menu

Changes

→‎History: This is a normative question, not descriptive
{{Topic
|Question=What are the type of historical indicators of theory acceptance? How markers can observational scientonomists establish be taken as indicative that such-and-such a question was accepted as a legitimate topic of inquiry by a certain epistemic an agent at a certain given time?|Topic Type=DescriptiveNormative|Description=Rawleigh has proposed that [[Question|As accepted questions]] be accepted into the ontology of epistemic elements of scientific change alongside theories and through time, it is important to have methods. This suggests of establishing that, such-and-such a question was accepted as well as there being a [[Mechanism legitimate topic of Question Acceptance]], that there should be inquiry by a certain epistemic agent at a certain time. What are the indicators of question acceptance that observational scientonomists can may employ to determine what questions were a part of a mosaic at any given time. ? An answer to the question of what sorts of evidence are acceptable as indicators of question acceptance is an essential step in enabling observational scientomists to identify which historical markers are relevant in deliberations over what questions were included in past and contemporary mosaics.
|Authors List=William Rawleigh,
|Formulated Year=2018