Difference between revisions of "Logical Presupposition"
(Created page with "{{Topic |Question=What is '''logical presupposition'''? How should it be ''defined''? |Topic Type=Definitional |Description=While theories are answers to questions presuppose...") |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|Accepted From Day=1 | |Accepted From Day=1 | ||
|Accepted From Approximate=No | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
− | |Acceptance Indicators= | + | |Acceptance Indicators=This is when Barseghyan and Levesley's [[Barseghyan and Levesley (2021)|''Question Dynamics'']] that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. |
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
|Accepted Until Era= | |Accepted Until Era= |
Revision as of 17:32, 1 August 2021
What is logical presupposition? How should it be defined?
While theories are answers to questions presuppose theories. The concept of logical presupposition is meant to denote the logical (as opposed to epistemic) aspect of the relation of presupposition.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan and Nichole Levesley in 2021. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 August 2021 | This is when Barseghyan and Levesley's Question Dynamics that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) | A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question. | 2021 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) | 6 February 2023 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2021-0001 | Scientonomy | 1 August 2021 | Accept the definitions of logical presupposition and epistemic presupposition. | Accepted | It was emphasized that the "modification is appealing given the presence of questions as a basic class of epistemic element in our ontology and the need to reference their presuppositions in observational scientonomy alongside proposed laws concerning questions in theoretical scientonomy".c1 The commentators agreed that "an epistemic agent could plausibly accept all the epistemic presuppositions without necessarily accepting all the logical presuppositions".c2 They also also noted that "accepting separate definitions of logical presupposition and epistemic presupposition would improve the specificity of our communal knowledge - and perhaps our visualization capabilities".c3 Specifically, "there is clear value in distinguishing logical and epistemic presuppositions in scientonomic diagrams".c4 Finally, the commentators highlighted the importance of the distinction for the law of question acceptance.c5 c6 | 6 February 2023 |
Current View
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021).
Logical Presupposition (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021) states: "A theory is said to be a logical presupposition of a question, iff the theory is logically entailed by any direct answer to the question."
TODO: Nikki add a description