Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Mechanism of Method Rejection (view source)
Revision as of 20:46, 26 February 2023
, 20:46, 26 February 2023no edit summary
{{Topic
|Question=When does an '''employed method ''' become '''rejected'''?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=In addition to describing how a method becomes employed, a theory of scientific change must also address the circumstances under which a community would alter their employed method. This question seeks to describe what happens to other elements in the mosaic when a community undergoes such a change.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2016
|Related Topics=Method Employment,
|Sorting Order=1200
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The law became ''de facto'' accepted by is when the community at that time together with accepted its first answer to the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. Since thenquestion, [[Modification:ScientoMethod Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2016-0001|attempts2015)]] have been made to replace this law,[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]] which indicates that the question is a very good indicator of theory acceptanceitself legitimate.
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}