Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mechanism of Method Rejection (view source)
Revision as of 20:46, 26 February 2023
, 20:46, 26 February 2023no edit summary
{{Topic
|Question=When does an '''employed method ''' become '''rejected'''?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=In addition to describing how a method becomes employed, a theory of scientific change must also address the circumstances under which a community would alter their employed method. This question seeks to describe what happens to other elements in the mosaic when a community undergoes such a change.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2016
|Related Topics=Method Employment,
|Sorting Order=1200
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The law became ''de facto'' accepted by is when the community at that time together with accepted its first answer to the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. Since thenquestion, [[Modification:ScientoMethod Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2016-0001|attempts2015)]] have been made to replace this law,[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]] which indicates that the question is a very good indicator of theory acceptanceitself legitimate.
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}
