Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
{{Topic
|Subject=Norm Employment
|Question=How do ''norms'' become ''employed'' by an epistemic agent?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Subfield=
|Inherited From=
|Heritable=
|Question Text Formula=
|Question Title Formula=
|Question=
|Question Title=
|Predicate=
|Object Type=
|Object Value True=
|Object Value False=
|Object Class=
|Object Enum Values=
|Object Regexp=
|Single Answer Text Formula=
|Multiple Answers Text Formula=
|Answer Title Formula=
|Description=As norms of any type - methods, ethical norms, aesthetic norms, etc. - can change through time, it is important to inquire as to ''how'' exactly they change. A proper answer to this question helps to shed light on one of the key aspects of the mechanism of scientific change.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change
|Authors List=William Rawleigh
|Formulated Year=2022
|History=Norms only became part of the scientonomic ontology in 2017 with the acceptance of [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0001|Sebastien's modification]] that introduced normative theories one of as types of theory. With the acceptance of [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0006|Barseghyan's redrafted ontology]] in 2019, methods became subsumed under the category of normative theory and employment became a stance that epistemic agents could take towards norms of all types, not just methods. This should have suggested the question of the mechanism of norm employment; yet, as formulating questions is often a creative process, it wasn't until [[Rawleigh (2022)|Rawleigh's 2022 paper]] that the question was explicitly formulated, together with a formulation of an answer to it - [[The Law of Norm Employment (Rawleigh-2022)|the law of norm employment]].
|Current View=
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change|Related Topics=Mechanism of Theory AcceptanceMethod Employment, Mechanism of Method EmploymentTheory Acceptance|Sorting Order=300
|Page Status=Needs Editing
|Editor Notes=
|Order=1
|Lower Order Elements=
|Related Theories=
}}
{{Acceptance Record