Difference between revisions of "Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015)"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (HakobBarseghyan moved page The Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) to Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) over a redirect without leaving a redirect)
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Theory
 
{{Theory
|Title=The Method Rejection theorem
+
|Title=Method Rejection theorem
 
|Theory Type=Descriptive
 
|Theory Type=Descriptive
 
|Formulation Text=A method ceases to be employed only when other methods incompatible with the method become employed.
 
|Formulation Text=A method ceases to be employed only when other methods incompatible with the method become employed.
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
 
|Formulated Year=2015
 
|Formulated Year=2015
|Description=A [[Method|method]] ceases to be employed only when other methods that are incompatible with it become employed. By the [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)|First Law]] for methods, an employed method will remain employed until it is replaced by other methods. By the [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]], the elements of the [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]] must be compatible with one another. Thus, a method can only become rejected when it is replaced by an incompatible method or methods[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 172-176]].
+
|Description=According to ''the method rejection theorem'', a [[Method|method]] ceases to be employed only when other methods that are incompatible with it become employed. By the [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)|First Law]] for methods, an employed method will remain employed until it is replaced by other methods. By the [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]], the elements of the [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]] must be compatible with one another. Thus, a method can only become rejected when it is replaced by an incompatible method or methods.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 172-176]]  
[[File:method-rejection-theorem.jpg|center|500px]]
+
{{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=Method-rejection-theorem.jpg}}
 
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
 
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
 
}}
 
}}
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|Accepted From Day=1
 
|Accepted From Day=1
 
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The theorem became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].  It is a deductive consequence of the zeroth and first laws of scientific change.
+
|Acceptance Indicators=The theorem became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].
 
|Still Accepted=Yes
 
|Still Accepted=Yes
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 15:50, 16 February 2017

This is an answer to the question Mechanism of Method Rejection that states "A method ceases to be employed only when other methods that are incompatible with the method become employed."

Method-rejection-theorem-box-only.jpg

Method Rejection theorem was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this theory:
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.Yes

Suggestions To Reject

These are all the modifications where the rejection of this theory has been suggested:

Modification Community Date Suggested Summary Verdict Verdict Rationale Date Assessed
Sciento-2023-0002 Scientonomy 28 December 2023 Accept new formulations of the first law for theories, norms, and questions that are in tune with the formulation of the first law. Also accept new formulations of the respective rejection theorems - theory rejection, norm rejection, and question rejection. Open

Question Answered

Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: When does an employed method become rejected?

See Mechanism of Method Rejection for more details.

Description

According to the method rejection theorem, a method ceases to be employed only when other methods that are incompatible with it become employed. By the First Law for methods, an employed method will remain employed until it is replaced by other methods. By the Zeroth Law, the elements of the scientific mosaic must be compatible with one another. Thus, a method can only become rejected when it is replaced by an incompatible method or methods.1p. 172-176

Method-rejection-theorem.jpg

Reasons

Reason: Method Rejection Theorem Deduction

By the first law for methods, an employed method will remain employed until it is replaced by other methods. By the compatibility corollary, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other at any moment of time. Thus, a method can only become rejected when it is replaced by an incompatible method or methods.1pp. 172-176 2pp. 72-74

Method Rejection Theorem deduction (Barseghyan-Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png

Method Rejection Theorem deduction (Barseghyan-Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png

This reason for Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar in 2018.2

Edit Delete

If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.

Questions About This Theory

The following higher-order questions concerning this theory have been suggested:

If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.

References

  1. a b c  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  2. a b  Fraser, Patrick and Sarwar, Ameer. (2018) A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change. Scientonomy 2, 67-82. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31278.