Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2018-0014"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Modification |Community=Community:Scientonomy |Acronym=Sciento |Summary=Accept the law of demarcation as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions concerning indicator...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 
|Acronym=Sciento
 
|Acronym=Sciento
|Summary=Accept the law of demarcation as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions concerning indicators of scientificity as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry.
+
|Summary=Accept the ''law of theory demarcation'' as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions concerning indicators of scientificity as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry.
 
|Date Suggested Year=2018
 
|Date Suggested Year=2018
 
|Date Suggested Month=December
 
|Date Suggested Month=December
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,
 
|Authors List=Ameer Sarwar, Patrick Fraser,
 
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
 
|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)
|Preamble=TODO: Add preamble
+
|Preamble=The ''law of theory demarcation'' argues that the changes in the stance of scientificty of epistemic agents towards theories follows systematic patters. In particular, if a theory conclusively satisfies the demarcation criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes scientific; if it conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria, remains unscientific, and if assessment is inconclusive, the theory’s status can become scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Given that conclusive satisfaction of the demarcation criteria preclude unscientific and uncertain status and conclusive failure to satisfy it preclude scientific and unscientific status of the theory, the ''law of theory demarcation'' is non-tautological.
 
|To Accept=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018), The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018),
 
|To Accept=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018), The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018),
 
|To Accept Questions=Indicators of Theory Scientificity, Indicators of Conclusiveness for Scientificity Assessment,
 
|To Accept Questions=Indicators of Theory Scientificity, Indicators of Conclusiveness for Scientificity Assessment,

Revision as of 06:15, 3 March 2019

Accept the law of theory demarcation as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions concerning indicators of scientificity as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry.

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar on 28 December 2018.1 This modification presupposes the acceptance of Sciento-2018-0013. The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.

Preamble

The law of theory demarcation argues that the changes in the stance of scientificty of epistemic agents towards theories follows systematic patters. In particular, if a theory conclusively satisfies the demarcation criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes scientific; if it conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria, remains unscientific, and if assessment is inconclusive, the theory’s status can become scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Given that conclusive satisfaction of the demarcation criteria preclude unscientific and uncertain status and conclusive failure to satisfy it preclude scientific and unscientific status of the theory, the law of theory demarcation is non-tautological.

Modification

Theories To Accept

Questions To Accept

  • Indicators of Theory Scientificity: What are the historical indicators of a theory’s scientificity? How can observational scientonomists establish that such-and-such a theory was indeed considered scientific/unscientific by a certain epistemic agent at a certain time?
  • Indicators of Conclusiveness for Scientificity Assessment: What are the historical indicators that an assessment by the demarcation criteria was conclusive or inconclusive? Does the lack of agreement or evidence count in favor of inconclusive assessment outcome?

Questions Answered

This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):

Verdict

The workshop discussion of this modification (25.02.2023)

The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending. The modification can only become accepted once modification Sciento-2018-0013 becomes accepted.

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.