Accept the definition of compatibility, as the ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic. Also replace the zeroth law with the compatibility corollary.
The current zeroth law of scientific change is problematic in many respects. First, it pertains only to epistemic elements that are part of the mosaic, and says nothing about the compatibility of elements outside the mosaic. In addition, unlike the other accepted laws of scientific change, it attempts to explain the process of scientific change from a static perspective that deals with the state of the scientific mosaic at some particular point in time, rather than a dynamic perspective that describes the actual mechanics of the process of scientific change. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the current zeroth law is tautological, as it pretty much restates what is implicit in our notion of compatibility. While there is currently no explicitly accepted definition of compatibility, it can roughly be explicated as the ability of two elements to coexist within a particular mosaic. If this is what we currently mean by compatibility, then the formulation of the current zeroth law is a direct consequence of it, which means that the law lacks empirical content. For all these reasons, a series of modifications are necessary, including the replacement of the zeroth law with a new definition of compatibility, and the compatibility corollary, which collectively preserve the gist of the current zeroth law.
Theories To Accept
- Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018): The ability of two elements to coexist in the same mosaic.
- Compatibility Corollary (Fraser-Sarwar-2018): At any moment of time, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other.
Theories To Reject
- The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015): At any moment of time, the elements of the scientific mosaic are compatible with each other.
This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):
- Compatibility: What is compatibility? How should it be defined?
- Compatibility of Mosaic Elements: Are all elements within a mosaic compatible with one another?
The modification is currently being evaluated; a verdict is pending.
Click on the Discussion tab for comments.
- Fraser, Patrick and Sarwar, Ameer. (2018) A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change. Scientonomy 2, 67-82. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31278.