Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2018-0017"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
|Date Assessed Day=11
 
|Date Assessed Day=11
 
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
 
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
|Verdict Rationale=The discussions concerning this modification took place mostly online, but primarily outside of this encyclopedia. There is a communal agreement that the modification is to be accepted as it fixes "an obvious of [Barseghyan's] original definition".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-154|c1]]</sup> Since "compatibility is a stance that can be taken towards methods, theories, and questions alike"<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-138|c2]]</sup> it is agreed that we need a definition that is applicable to all epistemic elements, not merely theories. It was also noted that the new definition has the advantage of being "neutral to the the addition of new epistemic elements to the scientonomic ontology".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-138|c2]]</sup>
+
|Verdict Rationale=The discussions concerning this modification took place mostly online, but primarily outside of this encyclopedia. There is a communal agreement that the modification is to be accepted as it fixes "an obvious of [Barseghyan's] original definition".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-154|c1]]</sup> Since "compatibility is a stance that can be taken towards methods, theories, and questions alike"<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-138|c2]]</sup> it is agreed that we need a definition that is applicable to all epistemic elements, not merely theories. It was also noted that the new definition has the advantage of being "neutral to the the addition of new epistemic elements to the scientonomic ontology".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-138|c3]]</sup>
 
|Superseded By=
 
|Superseded By=
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 15:09, 11 October 2020

Accept the new definition of compatibility criteria as criteria for determining whether two elements are compatible or incompatible.

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Patrick Fraser and Ameer Sarwar on 28 December 2018.1 The modification was accepted on 11 October 2020.

Preamble

The current definition of compatibility criteria concerns only theories and not other epistemic elements. However, since the notion of compatibility concerns all epistemic elements, the definition of compatibility criteria should also concern all epistemic elements, not just theories. Thus a new definition of the term is needed.

Modification

Theories To Accept

Compatibility Criteria (Fraser-Sarwar-2018).png

Theories To Reject

Questions Answered

This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):

Verdict

The modification was accepted on 11 October 2020. The discussions concerning this modification took place mostly online, but primarily outside of this encyclopedia. There is a communal agreement that the modification is to be accepted as it fixes "an obvious drawback of [Barseghyan's] original definition".c1 Since "compatibility is a stance that can be taken towards methods, theories, and questions alike"c2 it is agreed that we need a definition that is applicable to all epistemic elements, not merely theories. It was also noted that the new definition has the advantage of being "neutral to the the addition of new epistemic elements to the scientonomic ontology".c3

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Fraser, Patrick and Sarwar, Ameer. (2018) A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change. Scientonomy 2, 67-82. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31278.