Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,020
edits
Changes
Created page with "{{Bibliographic Record |Title=Ateleological Propagation in Goethe’s Metamorphosis of Plants |Resource Type=journal article |Author=Gregory Rupik |Year=2021 |Cover Image= |Ab..."
{{Bibliographic Record
|Title=Ateleological Propagation in Goethe’s Metamorphosis of Plants
|Resource Type=journal article
|Author=Gregory Rupik
|Year=2021
|Cover Image=
|Abstract=It was commonly accepted in Goethe’s time that plants were equipped both to propagate themselves and to play a certain role in the natural economy as a result of God’s beneficent and providential design. Goethe’s identification of sexual propagation as the “summit of nature” in The Metamorphosis of Plants (1790) might suggest that he, too, drew strongly from this theological-metaphysical tradition that had given rise to Christian Wolff’s science of teleology. Goethe, however, portrayed nature as inherently active and propagative, itself improvising into the future by multiple means, with no extrinsically pre-ordained goal or fixed end-point. Rooted in the nature philosophy of his friend and mentor Herder, Goethe’s plants exhibit their own historically and environmentally conditioned drives and directionality in The Metamorphosis of Plants. In this paper I argue that conceiving of nature as active productivity—not merely a passive product—freed Goethe of the need to tie plants’ forms and functions to a divine system of ends, and allowed him to consider possibilities for plants, and for nature, beyond the walls of teleology.
|Historical Context=
|Synopsis=
|Criticism=
|URL=
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00387-6
|Page Status=Stub
|Publisher=
|ISBN=
|Collection=
|Journal=History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
|Volume=43
|Number=
|Pages=32
}}
|Title=Ateleological Propagation in Goethe’s Metamorphosis of Plants
|Resource Type=journal article
|Author=Gregory Rupik
|Year=2021
|Cover Image=
|Abstract=It was commonly accepted in Goethe’s time that plants were equipped both to propagate themselves and to play a certain role in the natural economy as a result of God’s beneficent and providential design. Goethe’s identification of sexual propagation as the “summit of nature” in The Metamorphosis of Plants (1790) might suggest that he, too, drew strongly from this theological-metaphysical tradition that had given rise to Christian Wolff’s science of teleology. Goethe, however, portrayed nature as inherently active and propagative, itself improvising into the future by multiple means, with no extrinsically pre-ordained goal or fixed end-point. Rooted in the nature philosophy of his friend and mentor Herder, Goethe’s plants exhibit their own historically and environmentally conditioned drives and directionality in The Metamorphosis of Plants. In this paper I argue that conceiving of nature as active productivity—not merely a passive product—freed Goethe of the need to tie plants’ forms and functions to a divine system of ends, and allowed him to consider possibilities for plants, and for nature, beyond the walls of teleology.
|Historical Context=
|Synopsis=
|Criticism=
|URL=
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00387-6
|Page Status=Stub
|Publisher=
|ISBN=
|Collection=
|Journal=History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
|Volume=43
|Number=
|Pages=32
}}