Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
{{Topic
|Question=What is the status of '''tacit theories''' in the TSCscientific mosaic? Is it possible for a community to claim they do not actually accept a given theory, when they actually dowithout openly formulating it?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=Whether or not explicitly accepted theories comprise Historically, there seem to be cases when certain beliefs of the entire scope of scientific knowledge within a given communityremain not articulated. For instance, bears significant importance to it can be argued that the scientonomic 19th century physics community. Determining accepted that space cannot be curved in the status presence of material objects, yet this assumption remained tacit theories. The important theoretical question is to understand whether this is actually the case, i.e. whether there is actually such a thing as ''tacit theory of scientific change describes how a community could claim acceptance of one theory, while in actuality they accept the propositions of another''.|Parent Topic=|Authors List=Jacqueline Sereda,
|Formulated Year=2016
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2016
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Current View=
|Related Topics=Status of Technological Knowledge
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=Surely we have an accepted answer to this. We customarily talk of tacit elements.
|Order=1
|Lower Order Elements=
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Accepted From Month=April
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=NoYes|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the seminar of [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Era=
|Accepted Until Year=
|Accepted Until Month=
|Accepted Until Day=
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=
}}