Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) (view source)
Revision as of 22:37, 19 January 2023
, 22:37, 19 January 2023no edit summary
|Question Text Formula=
|Question Title Formula=
|Question=Is the [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)]] 's original second law a tautology?
|Question Title=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)
|Predicate=is tautological
|Object Enum Values=
|Object Regexp=
|Single Answer Text Formula=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) 's original second law is <object>.
|Multiple Answers Text Formula=
|Answer Title Formula=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is <Object>
|Description=As any law, the [[The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)|Barseghyan's original second law ]] attempts to forbid certain courses of action, for otherwise it would lack any empirical content and would be a tautology. HoweverThus, it is not quite clear whether the law in its current formulation can be contradicted by any conceivable situation. So the question is whether the Barseghyan's original second law is tautological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there are circumstances (perhaps the collapse any conceivable courses of the society which contains the scientific community) events under which the second law can in principle be violated?.
|Authors List=Rory Harder
|Formulated Year=2013
|Current View=
|Parent Topic=
|Page Status=StubNeeds Editing
|Editor Notes=
}}