Difference between revisions of "Implicit"
(Created page with "{{Topic |Question=What is '''implicit''' knowledge? How should it be ''defined''? |Topic Type=Definitional |Description=The distinction between explicit and implicit/tacit has...") |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Topic | + | {{Definitional Topic |
|Question=What is '''implicit''' knowledge? How should it be ''defined''? | |Question=What is '''implicit''' knowledge? How should it be ''defined''? | ||
− | + | |Description=The distinction between explicit and implicit/tacit has played a prominent role in the discussions concerning scientific change, including scientonomic discourse. Thus, it is important to have a clear definition of the term. | |
− | |Description=The distinction between explicit and implicit/tacit has played a prominent role in the discussions concerning scientific change, including scientonomic discourse. | ||
|Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Maxim Mirkin, Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2018 | |Formulated Year=2018 | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{Acceptance Record | ||
+ | |Community=Community:Scientonomy | ||
+ | |Accepted From Era=CE | ||
+ | |Accepted From Year=2018 | ||
+ | |Accepted From Month=December | ||
+ | |Accepted From Day=28 | ||
+ | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
+ | |Acceptance Indicators=The publication of [[Maxim Mirkin]]'s ''[[Mirkin (2018)|The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic]]'' is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community. | ||
+ | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
+ | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 21:40, 11 December 2022
What is implicit knowledge? How should it be defined?
The distinction between explicit and implicit/tacit has played a prominent role in the discussions concerning scientific change, including scientonomic discourse. Thus, it is important to have a clear definition of the term.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- Not explicit.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) | Not explicit. | 2018 |
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) | 1 September 2019 |
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2018-0011 | Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable. | Accepted | The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2 | 1 September 2019 |
Current Definition
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018).
Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Not explicit."
Implicit is the opposite of explicit and, thus, it doesn't require more than a very minimalist definition. This definition creates a strong link between the two concepts and won't require any changes in the definition of implicit when the respective definition of explicit happens to change.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of implicits.
Disjointness
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of an implicit.
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, the following supertype of Implicit is currently accepted:
Associations
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Implicit.
Epistemic Stances Towards Implicits
The question has no accepted answer.
If a question concerning the ontology of an implicit is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Implicits
The question has no accepted answer.
Necessary Implicits
The question has no accepted answer.
If a question concerning the dynamics of an implicit is missing, please add it here.